Faced
with the constant wrong predictions and forecasts of the experts in
international relations that the masses choose to applaud and take as
references, blaming Donald Trump has been adopted as a means of escape and
justification.
This
is exactly what annoys the leftists so much.
The
radical left/communists have once again gain ground all around the world under
the disguises of ecofascism, racist accusations of racism, hormonal
experimentation on children and by trying to convince us that China's economic
success is a result of their ancient tradition which gives them a superior
wisdom and not because of intellectual property theft, their infiltration of
spies in other countries and their perverse system based on slaves.
This
“new” left, which is tailor-made for snobs of underdeveloped intellectualism,
is endorsed by many who do not want to be identified as socialists or
communists and who, furthermore, consider themselves on a higher scale by
calling the average American citizen "the uneducated class", without
realizing that if it weren't for these Americans they would still be eating the
crumbs of some absolute king and would have zero degree of literacy.
Unfortunately,
this know-it-all and anti-progress school of resentment has penetrated American
education and the left has taken advantage of it. Today it would be unthinkable
to see the wife of a presidential candidate to call for the fight against
communism, as Jacqueline Kennedy has done in support of her husband JFK. On the
contrary, the current president and his family have strong and proven dark and
corrupt business ties with the Chinese Communist Party.
Biden
did not arrive at the White House by chance, nor because he got the votes he
needed to get there. At least, not in a transparent way. He is there because
Trump had to be removed at any price. So it was.
Biden
did not disembark in the White House alone, he was accompanied by a team with
strong ties to the more radical left.
I
understand that saying that in the United States there was a massive fraud and
that the extreme left has taken over the Democratic Party make the “experts”
and the public opinion formed with TED talk uncomfortable, but unfortunately
the evidence of fraud are monstrous and the actions of the Democrats confirm
daily that they do not follow the ideas of either Jefferson, or Madison, but
that of Mao or Xi Jinping.
Nothing
left the Biden administration's anti-American strategy more in evidence than
his handing over Afghanistan to the Taliban.
Many
will say that it is all a consequence of Trump's "pact with the
Taliban". Well, if that pact had been fulfilled, the result would have
been the one achieved when it came into force: no deaths and the Taliban
outside of Afghanistan.
The
pact, like all policies that resulted from the Trump presidency, has been
scrapped in the first weeks of the Biden term. No one can deny it; this was
publicized, applauded and defended by those who had predicted the third world
war as a consequence of Donald Trump's hairstyle.
Financing
Iran, closing the pipeline in the United States but allowing Russia to build
its gas pipeline, opening the southern border and invite an uncontrolled
invasion, kneeling before Europe by signing the anti-productive and
anti-private property project called the "Paris Agreement", taking
three days to speak out on the protests against the Cuban communist dictatorship,
re-financing Maduro, calling “terrorists” to those who defend the founding
principles of the United States, but trusting the Taliban terrorists with
security, accusing of racism to those who defend the Second Amendment, but
calling “peaceful protesters” to those who burn businesses and throw away the
Lincoln statue, delivering a lethal blow to the country's energy self-supply
and kneel before the OPEC, are actions that summarize in a overwhelming way the
achievements of the Biden administration.
Nothing
of what the White House has done in these nine months has been malpractice. It
was not by mistake the return of power to Russia, nor was it opening the way to
Chinese expansionism, financing Iran and handing over Afghanistan to the
Taliban.
What
are the evidence to affirm such a thing? Facts are. There are two options. Or
those who are now in the highest echelons of the United States government and
the military hierarchies do not have the slightest idea of what they do or they
did it on purpose.
Even
a child could have guessed that the consequences of abandoning billions of
dollars in weapons, of leaving the Afghan forces without support or supplies
would lead them to forced surrender and to the takeover of territory and
weapons by the Taliban. The equation is quite easy; no margin for error. The
result was obvious.
How
did the events unfold?
First
of all, it must be remembered that the goal of withdrawing troops from
Afghanistan is a long-standing one. It does not go back to the presidency of
Donald Trump, but to the end of the Bush administration. People were tired of
the wars in the Middle East, and that is why Barack Hussein Obama used this
subject to campaign during the 2008 presidential election. He promised to get
out of Iraq. He and Hillary Clinton did it in such a way that they succeeded in
reinforcing and expanding ISIS.
In
the Trump era, thanks to the successful missions in the Middle East, the
advance of ISIS in Syria and Iraq was strongly reversed and their terrorist
structure was almost completely eliminated. Having achieved this, the next
objective was Afghanistan, where it was decided to lower the number of troops
and elaborate a way to end the American military intervention in that country.
Mike
Pompeo not only met with the Taliban, he also met with the entire political arc
of Afghanistan. The conditions of these talks can be summarized like this: the
Taliban was going to receive a response of unexpected magnitudes if they
touched a single American or if they established alliances with other terrorist
groups. The idea was not to trust them; the idea was to corner them.
It
is important to remind pundits of poor memory that the deal with the Taliban
was started by Obama and that the differences with that of Trump and Pompeo are
significant. The Democrat's pact was secret and only became known when the
terrorists made it known, and as a consequence Obama freed from Guantanamos the
“Taliban dream team”, so called for being high strategists of the 9/11 attack.
This, and not Trump's, is the pact that the current American president
followed.
Joe
Biden, like Obama, has made an immeasurable effort since day one of his
presidency to transform and bring the United States to the level of the Latin
American third world or the always lagging continental Europe. This was evident
in Afghanistan, a place that served as the perfect setting to artificially
corrode – in a very devastating way - the image, power and efficiency of the
United States Armed Forces.
The
date for the withdrawal that had been established by the Trump administration
(only if the conditions were in place) was set for May 1. When Biden became
president, in the midst of dismantling the policies of the previous
administration, he decided that the withdrawal would be on September 11. A very
significant date that would give him the possibility to attend the ceremony for
the twenty years of the biggest terrorist attack on American soil and to self
congratulate him for having brought the final peace with the end of the war in
Afghanistan.
Faced
with criticism for the opportunism of the chosen date, he had a
"better" idea and changed the date again. In April he announced that
he had already ordered and started the withdrawal. In May the Taliban began to
advance through Afghanistan and Biden's reaction was not to counterattack as
indicated in the pact that he said to follow, what he finally did was to
accelerate the withdrawal of troops.
On
July 6, 90% of the operations were concluded, with the finishing touch of the
abandonment of the Bagram air base.
These
are the actions that show that the pact of conditions imposed by the Trump
administration to the Taliban was not followed at all. Joe Biden accelerated
the evacuation of those who were armed leaving the unarmed adrift, closed the
only air base that could guarantee safe evacuation and left the Kabul airport
as the only exit, where there are no minimum conditions to be able to carry out
this task in a country taken over by terrorism.
As
if all of the above was not enough, the fundamental guidelines of a military
withdrawal were not met: dismantling the bases, destroying weapons that cannot
be carried and burning papers with sensitive information. All of this remained
intact at the fingertips of the Taliban, who are friends and associates of the
Chinese Communist Party.
If
all this does not attract enough attention to clarify that nothing was a
mistake, you just have to go a little deeper.
Surely,
at this instance the question that arises comes from the excuse that Joe Biden has
given. These military bases, these weapons and everything else were not made
available to the Taliban, but to the Afghan armed forces, but they decided to
surrender to the terrorist movement instead of defending their country, so why
should Americans stay and risk their lives to defend Afghanistan?
This
shortcut that the Democrat president took to defend himself is a misleading. Although
the behavior of the Afghan soldiers was not always exemplary (even before the
American withdrawal), the truth is that they could not do anything to counterattack,
because they had been abandoned.
The
military structure in Afghanistan worked as follows: Afghan forces depended on
American forces. Air support was essential not only to carry out attacks on enemy
targets, but also as a way to resupply those who operated in ground positions.
Joe
Biden ordered the evacuation of the supply providers, the aircraft maintenance
team and closed the base by withdrawing the soldiers in charge of air support.
He did not give any warning to the Afghan forces.
They
turned off the light and left. The Bagram's base was immediately taken by the
mobs so when the Afghan military arrived at the base, it was already totally
looted.
The
Afghan soldiers, even if they wanted to, would not have been able to defend
themselves. They were left without supplies, without intelligence, without any
point of support. They only had to surrender to the Taliban, and that is what
they did.
When
Kabul finally fell, the State Department began sending visas online without
names, causing the chaos that we saw on television and social networks. Few
missed the opportunity to get this email and add their name to it.
We
were also able to observe the lack of control and preparation of the Kabul
airport to achieve an orderly and safe evacuation and the planes taking off
among crowds of people with the high risk that this implies both for those on
the runway and for those on the plane. Also, what would happen if there was an
attack on those planes? It has happened before and it can happen now. Who is
Biden going to blame?
For
the moment and despite the chaos, the planes managed to take off, but this did
not prevent the enemies of the free world from starting to act, exploding two
bombs and leaving hundreds of wounded and dead, among them thirteen American
soldiers. It was the largest casualty in a decade.
Although
today we see it from a distance, the perception that could lead us to think
that the problem is only in Afghanistan is false. This chaos is a problem for
the whole world. Joe Biden's actions have consequences.
In
this new scenario designed and carried out with total perfection by the
Democratic Party, a large subsidiary of the Chinese Communist Party, terrorism
again took control.
Russia
once again with power over Europe, communist China rubbing its hands to enter
Taiwan and advance through the world with its totalitarian imperial project
called the Belt and Road Initiative, the Taliban owning territory again,
state-of-the-art weapons and advanced military bases to their disposition, Iran
making a fool of Biden after he sent them again a huge amount of money and the
southern borders open to an unprecedented invasion, the threats to the free
world have never been so many.
We
are not just talking about a scenario where you can blow up a skyscraper, or
kill passersby; the complexity has gone to a level of nuclear danger.
Perhaps,
this hypothesis sounds far-fetched, but it ceases to be so when we pay
attention and see who the world “players” that look "strong" are and
the weakness the United States is reflecting. This was a manufactured weakness;
but weakness at last.
China,
Iran, Russia and the Taliban in command of Afghanistan, allied with groups that
were once their enemies are now together with a common goal: to destroy Uncle
Sam. How would they do it? There are many possible ways, but it only takes an
open border and the free access of anyone who decides to set up a caravan to
invade a country. Everything is served on a tray.
As
Biden takes the Taliban as allies and provides them with lists with the whole
information of the Americans and Afghans who for twenty years were annihilating
terrorists, the whole world became, once again, a dangerous place. Meanwhile,
the shield of the free world, the United States of America, is showing weakness
in its decisions, in its defense standards, but above all in the morale of
those who lead this great country.
No
"expert" in lexical juggling to justify the unjustifiable can stop the
danger that has been imposed on the world today. No third world snob in his
constant exercise to be the most useful idiot can defuse the bombs that are
beginning to kill thousands of innocent people.
As
usual, the only ones who can avoid this madness are the Americans, the same
ones who have always fought and died for their freedom, for the freedom of the
whole world and even for the freedom of those who envy them, their success and
their way of life.
For
this to happen, the first thing Americans have to acknowledge is that they do
not have an inexperienced person in the White House, but the enemy. Nothing is
a mistake. It is all intended. If time and time again they have tried to twist
the principles of the American republic and federalism within the United
States, even on issues that have a lot of opposition, why would not try to wipe
out the solemnity of America and its armed forces when they have the
possibility to do it within easy reach and without objection?
Surely,
the American people, that sleeping giant who is being haunted by the culture of
cancellation, will awaken and, once again, will teach a lesson in courage and
freedom.
Unfortunately, in these instances, the price to pay will once again be very high. Since far from having finished a warlike conflict, a new war has begun.
Virginia Tuckey.-
Comentarios